Come and join the Tour of 2013, too!

A BUNCH of tournaments are coming up!

A heated debate it will be, huh?

If you go take a look at my archieve, there is got to be a post about the economic sovereignty of Europe! It's closely related to this.

Pages

Sunday, 28 April 2013


Since I'm really interested in debate, my friend and I are participating in the 2013 ICY with the thesis below. Well, actually it isn't a complete thesis-it's just an abridgement. The final draft will be uploaded by June. Enjoy!


<Inquiry of Different Speech Styles in Student Parliamentary Debate>

Korean Minjok Leadership Academy

1300, Sosa-ri, Anheung-myeon, Hoengseong-gun, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea



1. Research Background and Purposes

We met upon English debating a few years ago. Our speeches were very unstable and went this way and that way in the beginning as we practiced for competitions. Looking through videos of the WSDC, we got to find out different debate styles: tones, accents and intonations. Moreover, as we further went into the debate field, participating in many contests, we were able to access different speech skills. As we tried to figure the ways to improve our debate skills, this led to our curiosity of what kind of style will persuade the adjudicator and thus lead to a win in a parliamentary debate. Under the standardized rules of WSDC, it is our goal to figure out what style of speaking can actually work positively in a debate. Since there are various voices of what method is effective, we believe that this research can lead to a professional and standardized summary of what can actually be a benefit in debate speeches. Also, we believe that this kind of compiled guideline can also help people in the future in implementing diverse speaking styles to make a persuasive speech.

2. Research Questions

i) What are the standards of evaluation in the World School’s Debate Championship?

ii) What are the effects of different accents: British, American, and Australian accents, in making speeches?

iii) What are the pros and cons of different speech styles (e.g. A. Lincoln style speech, B. Obama style speech, Martin Luther King Jr. style, W. Churchill style, and M. Thatcher style)

iv) How should the speech style differ in a policy debate and a moral debate?

3. Key Contents of to Achieve Purposes

i) The basic ballot template and the main considerations the judges of WSDC should consider.

a. Manner

b. Matter

c. Contents

ii) How can English skills in general alter the speech abilities in debates.

a. Vocabulary

b. Grammar

c. Fluency of speech

d. What other rhetorical methods can be used to enhance the speech?

iii) The effects of different accents under the category of the followings:

a. The effects to the audience, how much is it understandable?

b. The effects to the speaker, how efficient is the accent in making an oration?

iv) Research information of famous speeches in general and as well as renowned speakers.

a. Research various analysis on different speeches and speakers.

b. Make an analogy between famous speakers' speeches.

c. Sort out the strong parts and weak parts of famous speaker's oration style.

v) Analyze the necessary styles in the two different types of debates, moral debates and policy debates

a. Figure out styles needed for debates of which topic is an argument to whether to pass a policy or not

b. Figure out styles needed for debates of which topic is a question about moral value or preference.

Workload Division

3. Research Methods

i) Surveys

a. Using surveys of preference on what method of speaking(accent, argument elaboration style) is more persuasive

b. Via actually demonstrating different accents by students who have lived in different countries in the past

c. Via actually demonstrating mock debate(with speakers who argue in different styles) and showing WSDC videos which are distinguished by their elaboration style

d. Surveys will be done toward all the students(approximately 450 people) of our school(since it is a dormitory school) and also on www.surveymonkey.com

ii) Interviews

a. Interview experts in the debate field for the purpose of finding out their standards of marking scores in debates

b. experts : Korean Minjok Leadership Academy debate teacher W. Baumgardner & graduates & seniors

iii) Others

a. Research papers written by NFL(National Forensics League) and other debate institutions

b. Other information extracted from Internet thesis websites

4. Expected Results and Potential Impact

a. Debaters will be able to increase their persuasiveness

b. Clarifying questions that were continuously raised among the debate field but were considered as a taboo (e.g. Is British accent really appealing to judges?)

c. Therefore utilizing these knowledge in real life-enabling a more sophisticated communication style and spreading the debate culture

 

Sunday, 21 April 2013

Mosses; Useful Indicators for Environmental Pollutions


This thesis is the one that i submitted to the 2012 ICY(International Conference of Youth) as my project. I am in the Moon-Kwa(humanities) section, not the natural science section, but I am interested especially in the environment field(&the protection of it) indeed. (Which made 'The Age of Stupid' especially special to me) I wrote an paper about how mosses can reflect the severeness of environmental pollution for several weeks.

***I couldn't post the pictures because of some mechanical problems within the Word file. But thank god; I did have some in a separate folder!






Mosses; Useful Indicators for Environmental Pollutions

ABSTRACT

Mosses are environmentally sensitive organisms, and so far have been intensively used for biomonitoring of water and air pollution. It is known that the sensitivity largely comes from their unique structure, for example moss leaves are usually only a single cell in thickness, which leads to ready absorption of water from the environment. In this study, we have examined the effects of exposure to environmental pollution on the growth and development of mosses. We have evaluated the growth of mosses exposed to 5 kinds of the artificial and realistic pollutants such as artificial acid rain, artificial domestic wastewater, and car exhaust gas, which are common pollutants in our lives. In the artificial acid rain experiment, we found that the growth of mosses was sensitively affected by pH of the pollutants rather than total amount of the acidic pollutant treated. Interestingly the study on the effect of artificial domestic wastewater revealed that total amount of the pollutant treated was proportional to dead portion of moss samples. Fumes of a mosquito repellent coil used as an artificial air pollution led to partial damage on the growth of mosses. On the contrary, the pollutants collected around our town did not affect on the growth of mosses. We concluded that the growth of mosses were sensitive not only to relatively strong acid pollutants but also to wastewater. However, the growth of mosses was not affected by pollutions around our town, indicating the degree of pollution around our town would be quite low.




 
 

INTORDUCTION

Mosses are environmentally sensitive organisms, and so far have been intensively used for bio-monitoring of water and air pollution. Recently, through researches conducted by developed countries such as Japan and the USA, the ecological function of mosses is being greatly recognized. Acting as a healing poultice over the barren nature, they provide protection for germinating seeds in the natural reforestation of environmentally sterile areas. Also, their functions of absorbing and storing water form a suitable environment for diversified forms of life, contributing to the maintenance of the ecosystem.

Mosses are small and soft that at are typically 1–10 cm tall, although it varies depending on the species. Because they are unicellular plants, they do not have flowers or seeds, and their root, stem, and leaves are not clearly distinguished. Instead of the root, fine brown filaments called rhizoids are used for anchoring the plant. With a few exceptions, mosses have no central core in the stem for conducting moisture and nutrients throughout the plant, which is a major difference from other higher vascular plants. Thus, they depend largely on the atmosphere and rainwater full of nutrients washed from the forest canopy overhead. Some species have the stems covered in a brown woolly coat called tomentum, an extension of the rhizoid system. In certain conditions of humidity, this coat becomes a swollen gelatinous mass feeding water to the stem and leaves externally. Mosses are affected more than other plants by pollution because of this ready absorption of substances from the atmosphere.

Mosses are typically found in environments of moist and low light, such as wooded areas and at the edges of streams. They are also found in cracks between paving stones in damp city streets. Some types have adapted to urban conditions and are found only in cities. Their photosynthesis mostly takes place in approximately 25℃, and they grow adequately in 400Lux of light.

Main functions of mosses include the formation and maintenance of the ecosystem, the prevention of soil erosion and the use of raw materials for medicine.

Firstly, mosses play a critical role in the ecosystem. They absorb and retain moisture, and spread a healing poultice over the raw wounds of nature. They prevent erosion of the soil from slopes and open spaces, and provide cover for germinating seeds in the natural reforestation of burned areas. Also, they form an adequate environment for myriad forms of life active in the maintenance of the ecosystem. Secondly, mosses prevent soil erosion. Whenever heavy rain falls the rhizoids retain a thick blob of mud. The reason for this is that the cell walls of the rhizoids secrete a mucilaginous substance that literally sticks them to soil particles and insures the plant a secure footing wherever it grows, including earth, rock or wood. This ability to anchor makes moss most effective in its earth binding role. Finally, mosses can be used for raw materials of novel medicine. Due to their great absorption of water, the Indians and Inuit used the moss for dressing wounds, and the natives of northern Alaska still make a salve from Sphagnum leaves and animal fat for this purpose. During the First World War, thousands of tons of Sphagnum mosses were used as surgical dressing. It was found to be far more efficient than cotton for this purpose, absorbing 10 to 20 times its dry weight in moisture. And whereas cotton absorbs moisture only locally to the point of saturation, Sphagnum moss, by its peculiar cellular structure, absorbs the moisture into every cell of its mass. Also, the extracts of mosses are also used for treating bronchitis, cardiovascular diseases, and making diuretics.

The main aim of this study is to find out the effects of exposure to environmental pollution on the growth and development of mosses quantitatively. We have examined the growth and self purification ability of mosses where they receive pollutants such as artificial acid rain, artificial domestic wastewater, river water and car exhaust gas, which are common pollutants in our lives. We have also attempted to figure out whether mosses are particularly useful as pollution indicators.



EXPERIMENTAL

Materials.Mosses (Thuidium Kanedae SAK species) were collected randomly on October 3, 2010, from a park area on Bundang-Gu, Gyeonggi-Do, KOREA. Plastic bottles made from PET were used as growing pots for moss samples. Artificial acid rain was made from acetic acid and water. The pH of the water solutions were adjusted to pH 3, 4, 5, 5.6 using a pH meter. Soapy water (Liquid soap) was used as artificial domestic wastewater. The pH of the artificial domestic waste water was adjusted to pH 6. River water was collected from Bundang creek on Bundang-Gu, Gyeonggi-Do, KOREA. Artificial air pollution samples caused by forest fire were prepared by using a mosquito repellent coil. The car exhaust gas was collect into a seal plastic bag directly from an exhaust pipe of a car.

Methods. The collected mosses were planted to plastic pots. The pots were kept under sun light at room temperature for 3 days with giving fresh water in order to confirm that the environment of testing place was good enough for growing the mosses. The growth status of mosses was determined by the observation of color change in moss leaves. In the water pollution experiments, the treatment condition of artificial acid rain and domestic wastewater are listed in Table 1~2. The moss samples were given 5 ml of fresh water or the pollutant solution one time a day. In the river water experiments, moss samples were exposed to 5 ml of the Bundang creek water for 10 days. To examine the effect of air pollution on the growth of mosses, fumes of a mosquito repellent coil and car exhaust gases were collected into seal plastic bags, and the moss pots were put in the bags contained the pollution for 5 days.

Table 1. Treatment condition of artificial acid rain and domestic wastewater



Sample number
Treated
pollutants
Total Treatment days
Day 1
(Oct. 10)
Day 2
(Oct.
11)
Day 3
(Oct.
12)
Day 4
( Oct.13)
Day 5
(Oct.14)
Day 6
( Oct.15)
Day 9
( Oct.
18)
Day 12
( Oct.
21)
1
control
-
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
2
artificial acid rain
(pH 3)
1
A
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
3
2
A
A
W
W
W
W
W
W
4
3
A
A
A
W
W
W
W
W
5
4
A
A
A
A
W
W
W
W
6
artificial domestic waste- water
(pH 6)
1
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
7
2
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
8
3
D
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
9
4
D
D
D
D
W
W
W
W
Temp(°C)/Humidity (%)
22/63
20/71
21/71
19/65
18/64
18/39
17/46
20/57

*W: fresh water; A: artificial acid rain (pH 3); D: artificial domestic waste water (pH 6)

*Giving 5 ml of fresh water or the pollutant solution one time a day

Table 2. Treatment condition of artificial acid rains with different pH



Sample number
Treated
pollution material
pH
Day 1
(Oct. 21)
Day 2
(Oct.
22)
Day 3
(Oct.
23)
Day 4
( Oct.
24)
Day 7
(Oct.
27)
Day 10
( Oct.
30)
10
control
-
W
W
W
W
W
W
11
artificial acid rain
3
A
W
W
W
W
W
12
4
A
W
W
W
W
W
13
5
A
W
W
W
W
W
14
5.6
A
W
W
W
W
W
Temp(°C)/Humidity (%)
21/67
18/55
18/50
19/60
14/41
23/44

*W: fresh water; A: artificial acid rain (pH 3, 4, 5 or 5.6)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The current research provides a detailed description of common water and air pollutions and their effects on moss species. The overall aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of exposure to artificial and realistic pollutants on the growth quantitatively. Table 3 shows classification of pollutants used in this study.

Table 3. Classification of pollutants used in this study



Water pollution
Air pollution
Artificial pollutants
Acetic acid solution of pH 3, 4, 5, 5.6 (acid rain)
Soapy water (pH 6)
Fume of a mosquito repellent coil (Air pollutants caused by forest fire)
Realistic pollutants
River water
Car exhaust gas

Water pollution.As artificial acid rain and domestic wastewater, we used acetic acid solution and soapy water, respectively. Acid rain has harmful effects on plants and is mainly caused by sulfur and nitrogen gas from fuels such as coal and petroleum. In some places the acidification is so severe that the pH drops to around 4.0. Rare cases have been reported of acid rain having pH of around 2 - 2.5. Because the definition of acid rain is a rain with a pH less than 5.6, we chose 4 solutions having different acidity under pH 5.6. Domestic wastewater generally includes material disposed of through toilets, sinks, tubs and showers, washing machines and the like. Therefore surfactants, which are the base component for making soap, are one of the main pollutants of wastewater. Figure1 shows the effect of artificial acid rain and wastewater exposure on the growth of mosses. Treatment conditions of the pollutants are listed in Table 1. As shown in Figure 1a, the moss samples before treatment are appeared to be bright green color indicating a healthy status. On day 9 (Figure 1d), the color of the acid rain-treated samples (sample number 2~5) completely changed to yellow, suggesting all the moss samples died regardless of treated amount (days) of the artificial acid rain of pH 3. On the contrary, the color change of the wastewater-treated samples (sample number 6~9) depends on the amount of the pollutant. As shown in Figure 2 (a picture of the moss samples on day 12), the sample (sample number 9) treated with wastewater one time is healthy, whereas the sample treated with wastewater 4 times has almost died. In this experiment, we concluded that acidity of the artificial acid rain of pH 3 was so strong that only one dose led to severe result. However the effect of wastewater treatment was sensitive to the amount of the pollutant. In this case, mosses would be affected by the soap ingredients, not by the acidity because pH of the wastewater was 6.


a

 


b

 


c

 


 


Figure 1. The effect of artificial acid rain and waste water exposure on the growth of mosses (a: picture of moss samples before treatment; b: on day 2; c: on day 4; d: on day 9, the number on the growing pots represents the sample number listed in Table 1).




Figure 2. The effect of artificial acid rain and waste water exposure on the growth of mosses (on day 12, the number on the growing pots represents the sample number listed in Table 1.).




b

 


a

 


c

 


Figure 3. The effect of exposure of artificial acid rain of pH 3 (sample number 11), 4 (sample number 12), 5 (sample number 13) and 5.6 (sample number 14) on the growth of mosses (a: picture of moss samples on day 1; b: on day 4; c: on day 10, the number on the growing pots represents the sample number listed in Table 2).



Figure 3 shows the samples exposed to artificial acid rains with different pH. The treatment conditions are listed in Table 2. Compared to the sample 11, which was exposed to artificial acid rain of pH 3, the sample 12, 13 and 14 exposed to acid rain of pH 4, 5 and 5.6, respectively did not result in significant changes in growth. The result suggests mosses are susceptible to acidity of pollutants. In order to evaluate the effect of the total amount of acid exposed, a moss sample was treated with an acid rain of pH 4 for 15 days. Interestingly the color of the moss sample did not differ from controlled sample (Figure 4). Although the total amount of acid exposed to sample number 16 (pH 4 for 15 days) was larger than that of sample number 11 (pH 3 for 1 day) (the acid concentration of a solution of pH 3 is ten times higher than that of pH 4), the sample exposed to pH 4 for 15 days did not result in significant changes in growth. The result suggests that mosses have the self-purification ability when exposed to low concentration of an acid pollutant.

In order to examine the degree of the water pollution near our town, we collected river water from two different places of Bundang creek, and moss samples were treated with the river water for 10 days. As shown in Figure 5, no significant changes were detected even after being exposed for 10 days. The result indicates that pollution of the river water was not serious.


a

 


b

 


c

 


d

 


Figure 4. The effect of exposure of artificial acid rain of pH 4 for 15days (a: picture of moss samples on day 1; b: on day 6; c: on day 10; d: on day 15, sample number 15: control, sample 16: sample exposed to artificial acid rain of pH 4)

 


a

 


b

 


c

 


Figure 5. The effect of exposure of 5 ml of the river water for 10 days (a: picture of moss samples on day 1; b: on day 4; c: on day 10, sample number 17: control, sample 18, 19: sample exposed to Bundang creek water collected at two different places)



Air pollution. To examine the effect of air pollution on the growth of mosses, fumes of a mosquito repellent coil as an artificial air pollutant caused by forest fire were collected into transparent seal plastic bags, and the moss pots were put in the bags contained the pollution for 5 days. It is known that fumes of a mosquito repellent coil contain toxic chemicals such as formaldehyde, which is also found in the fume of forest fire and car exhaust gas. Figure 6b shows picture of moss samples exposed to the fume for 5 days. As shown in Figure 6b, the color of middle part of the sample (sample number 21) changed to yellow, suggesting mosses are sensitive to the chemical fume. Using car exhaust gases, we also examine the effect of real air pollutants on the growth of mosses. Car exhaust gases were collected directly from the exhaust pipe of a car into seal plastic bags, and the moss pots were put in the bags contained the pollution for 5 days. As shown in Figure 7, no significant changes were detected after being exposed to car exhaust gas. We believe that while the gas should contain toxic air pollutants, the concentration of the pollutants collected in the plastic bag is likely to be quite low.


Figure 6. The effect of artificial air pollutant exposure on the growth of mosses. Moss samples are placed into a plastic bag containing fumes of a mosquito repellent coil (a: on day 1, pollutant; b: on day 5, pollutant; c: on day 1, control; d: on day 5, control).




Figure 7. The effect of car exhaust gas exposure on the growth of mosses (a: picture of moss samples before treatment; b: a moss sample is inside a plastic bag containing exhaust gas; c: after exposed to 5 days, sample number 22: control).

 

 



CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have examined the effects of exposure to environmental pollution on the growth and development of mosses. We have evaluated the growth of mosses exposed to 5 kinds of the artificial and realistic pollutants such as artificial acid rain, artificial domestic wastewater, and car exhaust gas, which are common pollutants in our lives. In the artificial acid rain experiment, we found that the growth of mosses was sensitively affected by pH of the pollutants rather than total amount of the acidic pollutant treated. The result suggests that mosses have the self-purification ability when exposed to low concentration of an acid pollutant. Interestingly the study on the effect of artificial domestic wastewater revealed that total amount of the pollutant treated was proportional to dead portion of moss samples. Fumes of a mosquito repellent coil used as an artificial air pollution led to partial damage on the growth of mosses. On the contrary, the pollutants collected around our town did not affect on the growth of mosses. For example, no significant changes were detected after being exposed to river water and car exhaust gas. We concluded that the growth of mosses were sensitive not only to relatively strong acid pollutants but also to wastewater. However, the growth of mosses was not affected by pollutions around our town, indicating the degree of pollution around our town would be quite low. The moss is known to be one of the representative indicators for the environmental pollution, but we found that our environment such as river and air was not so polluted to measure with it. However, if the degree of acid rain or air pollution gets worse, mosses, which plays an important role to keeps our ecosystem, might be in danger of extinct. Therefore we should always keep an eye on our environment and protect it.

REFERENCE