This is a case file that Minwoo and I made when preparing the EDS(English Debate Society) Interview. the motion is as below. We put soooo much effort into it, so it would be nice if you take a look at it and try to imagine what happened in the debate. Fortunately, both of us were admitted; what big relief:-) -I invested nearly two weeks into this:_-
<<THW offer immunity to dictators in return of leaving power>>
1. Setup of entire Case
I. Definition
This House: International society
Dictators: Who have ruled their countries with forcible power, severe violence, and violating human rights. And these countries apply to nations under dictatorship that are undergoing serious crisis such as ‘civil war’ or ‘revolt’, or ‘threat against the world society’. For example, a situation similar to Libya before Quadafi was murdered, or the situation of Iraq, when Hussein declared war and attacked Kuwait, or that of North Korea, where Kim Jung Il is threatening the world with developing nuclear weapons. Why? This is because dictators are likely to commit immense massacre and mass destruction at such situations, and we all want to prevent this.
II. Policy
The PROP will offer immunity to dictators who are facing inner revolt and civil war. This immunity will erase the burden of guilt thus providing amnesty. Then the dictator will be exiled from the country. But what happens if the strongman does not accept the offer? In that case, there will be outer intervention in order to alleviate the situation of civil war and revolt, because there is no other option. So we can see that intervention will only work as a last resort for the dictator.
III. Stance
=Justice
A. Value of life
B. Democracy
C. Bright future of the nation
2. Actual Arguments
2-1. Setup
Theme: Destruction
1) Value of life (The biggest of all),
2) Only feasible solution: Benefits to both nation and world (Domestic Industry, World Economy, sake of outer forces. Examples like North Korea.
Theme: Democracyvg
3) Pursuit of Democratic value (Outer forces intervention: (own interest-manipulate the new gov), a independent setup by the civil forces)(But the reason of our policy=-‘cause life is most impt.
4) Expected Tragedy of Civil war-only realistic solution-include in the rebuttals!
Pursuit of Democracy
<>Democracy in the primary and the only objective of all, every single citizen and the world in today’s debate.
-Proving that democracy of the nation can be achieved only by offering immunity is the biggest burden of proof on the proposition.
1. Independent Setup by Civil, People’s politicians
-provides an adequate environment for the People to organized their own political house
--What do we mean, by “environment”?No immense warfare going on--(Settled down) (Less time&effort to recover) Good environment-high stability among the public, preventing sudden rebellion by different political factions in different regions.
- such stabilized political environment would trigger better democratic transition
--no bloodshed, therefore faster election with time for the political leaders to draft a new constitution
-At least allows a possibility for an “Independent” regime to establish at the first place.
-1) Civil revolt—will be wiped by fighter planes and artillery of the dictator, which civil forces do not have
-2) Outer interventionㅡa puppet regime; no independency at all
2. Prevents Manipulation upon democracy
-Any type of action instead of offering immunity is inevitably to be abused
-The reason why manipulation occurs, and what happens if it occurs
-1) Outer intervention: Countries are not charity: they cannot participate in wars for nothing but the name of “justice”,which actually is not, of course
:need compensation not to face severe disagreement upon the people-the voters
: And they, struggle to snatch many privileges from the nation as possible, and attempt to make the new established government as their puppet regime—severely deters democracy
2) Civil revolt
-2-1unorganized, no strong leader
-2-2weak army=beg for help to nearby countries—trade off weaponary and training for senator seats in the future government and privileges after the revolt has succeeded(happened in Libya)—severely deters democracy
What is the “Change” that people crave for? It is democracy, of-for-by the people. At the end of the day, I have proven to you that only the proposition can satisfy this ultimate goal.











